Ramphool And ANR v. Mahabir

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.5830 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision:24.01.2019 Ramphool and another ... Appellants Vs.

Mahabir ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that though both the Courts below have agreed with the relief of injunction regarding forcible interference and dispossession but did not grant the declaration on the basis of written exchange deed in the absence of registration and as well as existence of other co-sharers. He seeks leave of this Court for withdrawal of the present regular second appeal with liberty to avail the remedy in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE January 24, 2019 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2019.01.25 13:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh