Vikram Dewan v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46665-2019 Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 VIKRAM DEWAN

...Petitioner

Versus

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA ****

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate (Through V.C.) and Mr. Satnam Singh, Advocate for the respondent(s). SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last two effective dates of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition.

2.

Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE April 27, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2026.04.29 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document