Dipika Kumari And Others v. Suresh Kumar And Others
!
"# $ %&&%
" ' (') * '
$
+&&% ,- .
.
'$
%&/&% Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced?
Yes $
01 2& 2 2
! "
# $$$$ 2
&
% & '
( )
%%*+!*%, '-
. & ' /
%00
1 %,223
4& ' 56
(
!% +# ,!*783
9# 9+ 29*78
' -
((
6
() :0;
1
%<%*!*%+ ) ( '
' - ((
! =
%<%*!*%+ ( (( ( 1(> 3?
6
) 3
6)
( ) . "80#.8++!%) )
' (
'- '
,#* ) =
1( ) )
((
(
& ' ( (
"8%,@89*,<3
( & 6)
'
A
( '
9 '
() - ' )
)
(& (
- ? "
/ ) -
'
'-
(- ((
( BC !+# %0%*!*%+
!+,
#*98
C.
) # >
) - (
7
9
(
& '
) (8
!"
# $ %
&
' ((
*
+,%#!-# .
!
/ + 0122 33+ ) )& & &0 122 "
12%
/ . &
)
)
0 12%#"
)
/ 012%#" 4% 5
(
(
& ' )
7 "
)
<*;
))
7
' - ((
"
2 22 1 21
2 0 &
8
'-
& '
)
'
"
& '
)
(
' - ((
3<*;
(
<*;
8 6 &
- ' )
' - ((
'
'
+
)
- ()
(-' )
' - ((
'-
& ' (-'
( &
-
2 C
)
, =
(
)
)
8 3667-+18 3 ) +6
& #9 2
-923: & )
/ 6
;3% -92 # -92 -92" -92.
) 9 2 ) /#&
< )
-92 :& &
<
,
/ & = (
%
+,%# 7# !:!"
&
$ %
&
* &
&
)/ + ) / > #> &
* &&
* + & /
* , ?2 @
&
?
@&
1 +#6
& #9 %
+ -9%:& &
* / )
<
A / &
* " 3
<
!
:!"
;3%?-92@& /6 6 &
)
* 3
( &
& / B ,
' (( 6 "A 2A?-92"@ )
;3%?-92@& /6 6
* C 2
6 6 &
3)
/ 6
)
* A
6 &
< D )
& A
3
& / +
3
& D
A
* < )
&
2 .* ) #6 &
& #9 %
%
<
<
/ &
&
* /6 6 && ;3%?-92@
&
< 9
/ *
2 )
&
< &
& / &
<
& &
& #9 2 /
/
<
* / +6 ,&) )
&
2 ) & &
<
& /
?-92"@ & & 2 )
& &
D ) ?-92"@
)
/
< E ?-9%!@
*
+/ 3) 1
& & &
) /&
&
<
* / +-)
2 )
&
< )2 ) #9 &
3F
) % ( 6 !!
? @ 2F%"
C,E2( , / , A
&
&&
&
) A
) )
/ #
) )
) )
< /
6 / =
6 6 ?
@G ) 2( 6 B 2( %
& /D !!"?@2F% ?2( G , / @
&
&,E , A =
) A
) & < /
3
)
)
<
/
+ #6 &
/& < /
< % /
/
)
/
/5 %*
( )
& '
(
A
' - ((
'
%% &
(
' - ((
'
D8!
-8)
A
( )' (
((
)
(
(
"
- ( )
' ((
( ('
'
8 E
"
'
-
' %! ( - BC3@E%6) ( (
( -
B
(8 3@E!6
%+#.
.3@E#6
(
(
(
((
( %#
( ) '
E
( '
(
-
- '
((
&C
.
- -
(
' -
((
'-
( ( )
-'
%9 C) '
'
' - ((
-( (C Jiju Kuruvila v. Kunjujamma Mohan, 2013 (9) SCC 166 "
5' .
'
'
)
' '
36
'
) A- (( &
)
Kumari Kiran v. Sajjan Singh 2015 (1) SCC 339 ) ) '
((
'
(
) '
%<
& '
' - ((
-
)
( ) (- '
'-
- - ((
'
C '
(
( - ((
(
A
'- -
-
) %0 C
) -
) (
' - ((
)
'-
& ' C M. Nithya v. SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd.
(
SLP (Civil) No. 8330834 of 2023, "
5' .
)
' - ((
'
) ' '
&
( A -
(
(
' - ((
-
' - ' %+ )
( (
(
(
'-
& ' ' (
' - ((
' ('
' -
) %2 .
A -
A
-
((
(
( '-
%
') -
)
(
' - ((
%, (
)
)
'-
& '
8 2
1 16
2
!* "
5' .
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 75 % 2(,"
*
("
!
!
8
)
8 G30 *
&
9
* A
/
,
) <
A & ) & & &
&
9 #
?:"
@ &
/ "# ?:.@& / .4 # ?:
@ & / 9 9 31 &
&
3
/
H
9
& -) & /
&
)
?@ /
/; ( )
/ / ) &
&
&
3 )
/ &
/&
32*) ) ) /
/ &
& 9
H /,&) & /
& &
& / # 9 /
#
/ & &#
* * * * * * 42.
A?.@ )?
/
/ 6 * I* A
A @&
&
)
C? / @ / ) / )/ D# 4"
/ D#4 ""
/ D# "4.
/ D#
. ..
/ D#" .4
/ / & ) / )/ D#
/ D#!
44 / D# 44 / D# 44 / !% "
5' .
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 7 % 2 %48 )
%00 %0#8
%02
1 %,22
) ( 8 36
( E
3=6
(
(
3.6 (
'
- ( 36
' (
-
E )
3@6 B
(
() 'H 8 - E - &
(
8 G52. conventional heads &
& ) &9 % (J3 %
&
9 %
&
%
&
*
9 *% ( 6 ) & *
)
/
&
7
/
)< /<
)
*
)
9
/ )
*
*
1 & & 9
/
& )
/
/ < &
/ /
* & / 9 3 )
/ 9 %
%.
%
)/ *
)
= )
#
< #
&
& ) <
) / / H
/
& /
K K K K K 59.3
H
/ &
&
( &
3 & .
/
*
"
H & &.
/ 3
& &
4
/
H /
/ 9 59.43
& # / ? @ 9 /
.
H &
& & & .
/
H& & & .
/ H& & &
4 /
/ *
9 59.5;
9
/
"
" 6 $ L&
& ) 59.6. *
* 6 $ M
&
. ( 59.7*
/
59.8% )
/ 9 %
%.
%
)/*
H ) / / 5
+ !! "
5' .
9*
'
"
- '!("
')
*, ':
1;*;
.
<!&
'( *
-;
!
=(="( * = "!
744 2 /8
( 2 "-
< "* !(,"
"
'
:
=;
2(,"
) (
(
8 21A = A 2 / 6 J & )
&
&
1
3
N N
&
N N N
N N
N* &
/
&
/ & 9 & Spousal consortium /
#& &
&
) N
/
/
) /
( N Parental consortium
N
/
N " Filial consortium
/
/ *
/
A ) )
/ 22A
&
D
% (
& #) ) )
E 9
)
&
D (
&
* &
)
23*D $
)
)
3
&
&
2 &
&
)
&, A ) &
,&) &
/&
&
&
24* &
& ) /
&
N N
& 2 /6 J3
&
&
%.
!#
& ' (-
!%***78
'-
C
& ' (-)
%7#
)
E
(-
%+ "
)
& ' ( (
&
)
A
(
.
12
!9 )
)
'-"
5' .
'
( ) &)
%%*+!*%,
(- & 8
8
8 Sr. No.
Heads Compensation Awarded D/3 %
:# ; O.
%C.
:#?.
H
@ "
&
9
:"
%!C
:#? !.
P:"
@ . * 3 %!4
:#? !.
#!C
@ D
/ %"!!C.
:#?!4
P P @ F- %
:# ; -9 %
:# !
FA %4
:# ;
8%.
:#9 8%.
:#9 8%.C.
:#9
Total Compensation Rs.41,88,400/0 Deduction &
/ *
H
/ Rs.21,73,920/0 Enhanced amount Rs.20,14,480/0(418840002173920)
4 !<
'-"
5' .
Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma 5 /%
R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation + 2(,"
*
("
!
!
> 8 ( :,;
(
I
!0
8C
.
-
() )& ' )
)
-
( && '
'
()
7 )
%%*+!*%, & 7
'
& ' !+
(
-
+&&%
2
?
D (7
8 ( 7 D '