Ram Rajan Singh v. State Of Punjab
! "
#$% &&#'()*!*!)
( +, *-
-
-
!"
####
-
-
.*
$%&
'
() ** +,+&
-.) &/0 ,+ 1+ +,+&
$1/ $+, $20 $23 $2% $3141+,5'
.
6
1%2,7
%+
1/33
8
-.9
5 9
12+ : ( - 6( 8;
'9
< ( 9 4 = >9
-1-
(9 9
(
9
8
9
5
(
?
/ . ( 1+ ,1 +,1% 9 9
-. ) 03 1/ ,$ +,1% 9 9 -.)
(
+0 ,/ +,1% 9
@
5
'9 4
@
5 -.
(
6(9(65 5+3/,%5+,1%
$%+6
*
1+ ,1 +,1%9
9 (
65 '
,2 ,/ +,++
,2 ,/ +,++ < =
>A
6 (
<6 = ) 11&0/5+,++ 655+3/,%5+,1% -. 9 (
,+ 1+ +,+&
6 9
,$ +,+$ (,% 9 ( 6,% -
( 6 -2-
* (
( B(
( 7 9*
)
6 :
9 6
(
( 6 *9
( 6 ,% 0 > 6
5 * 6 ,%
9 5
!"!
#$%"#%!"!$% &
' (
)
* (
( '
+ (
( ,-,.'
%/ 1 Learned State Counsel has duly acknowledged that petitioner is regularly appearing before learned trial Court and there is no allegation that in case interim bail is made absolute, he is likely to misuse the concession or hamper the proceedings in any manner. .
( 9
(
-3-
6 : ( 9 .
,%
> C (
6C6 " C (
!
4
(
( 5 9 6 9
* (
( <=
?
.
(
9 (
/
(
<= ( )2'345.!) -
-
0 1 ,
2,3 0 2,3 -4-