Suryakant v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46579 of 2019 Date of decision:12.03.2020 Suryakant ... Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) Through the instant petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.352 dated 24.08.2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Azad Nagar, District Hisar. However, during investigation, Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 IPC were deleted and Sections 285 and 34 IPC were added.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Vinod Kumar submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation.

In view of the above facts, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 01.11.2019 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. March 12, 2020 (SUVIR SEHGAL) savita JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No SAVITA KADIAN 2020.03.13 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh