Tarsem Singh And ORS v. Anand Mohan Sharan Ias And ORS

COCP-3670-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3670-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 Tarsem Singh and others ......Petitioners Vs.

Anand Mohan Sharan and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present :

Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents.

**** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1.

The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-3659-2019.

2.

This Court had issued the following directions in CWP-36592019, vide its order dated 13.03.2024:- "43. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the respondent-State pass appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is found entitled for regularization/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the speaking order keeping in mind the directions given by the Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each petitioners qua their VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.09.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-3670-2024 (O&M) -2respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said benefit shall be given notionally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears will only be extended from the date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of filing the petition by the said petitioner." 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of the order dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-3659-2019, a speaking order dated 15.10.2024 has been passed by Sh. Ravinder Dhankar, IFS, Deputy Conservator of Forests, Kaithal, and a copy thereof has already been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact.

5.

In view of the above, since order dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-3659-2019, has already been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 25.09.2025 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.09.29 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document