Hardeep Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Others

CRWP No. 9519 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 9519 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.10.2024 Hardeep Singh and others ...PeƟƟoners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Ms. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the peƟƟoners.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate direcƟons to respondents No.2 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the peƟƟoners, the peƟƟoners have come up before this Court under ArƟcle 226 of ConsƟtuƟon of India. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoners submits that the peƟƟoners would be contended and saƟsfied if they are permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon before the respondent No.3 within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner.

3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representaƟon, if any filed within a period of three months. 5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoners, they are permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon before respondent No.3 within 15 days menƟoning their email ID as well as of their counsel and respondent No.3 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.07 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRWP No. 9519 of 2024 Police is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by delegaƟng the same to any officer not below the rank of IPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoners as well as their counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representaƟon. 6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoners and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is disposed of with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.07 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh