Balvinder Singh And ANR. v. Pardeep Kumar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

SAO-77-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2019 Balvinder Singh and another .... Appellants

Versus

Pardeep Kumar .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - None for the appellants.

Mr. Anil Kumar Malik, Advocate for the respondent. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Service complete.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent is taken on record. Be tagged at the appropriate place.

Despite the case having been called twice, the appellants have gone un-represented.

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that after remand of the case by the Ist Appellate Court, vide impugned judgment dated 23.08.2017, the trial Court has decided the suit afresh and the appellants have filed fresh appeal, therefore, the instant appeal has rendered infructuous.

In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed on two counts i.e. as having been rendered infructuous and for want of prosecution, as well.

July 09, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.07.11 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document