← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/9128/2025dismissed

Bhagwant Singh Bhullar v. State Of Punjab And Others

2025-08-25Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla2 pages

CRWP-9128-2025 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9128-2025 Date of Decision : 25.08.2025 BHAGWANT SINGH BHULLAR .... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .... RESPONDENTS CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present :- Ms.Amandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral) 1.

The prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to take legal action against respondents No.4 to 6 and lodge an FIR under the relevant sections of BNS on the basis of representation dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P-3); and for issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and to decide the representation dated 06.08.2025 (Annexure P-3).

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that respondent No.4, Gulzar Kaur, who resides in the vicinity of the petitioner's house, has been filing false and frivolous complaints against the petitioner in connivance with respondents No.5 and 6 on the basis of which the police authorities are continuously harassing the petitioner and his wife without any justification. Learned counsel further submitted that a representation dated Anju Goel 2025.08.28 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRWP-9128-2025 -206.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) has been given to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far.

3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepted the notice on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that on representation of the petitioner, the authority will take action as per law. 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to exhaust legal remedies available to him by moving an appropriate application before the Illaqa Magistrate in terms of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P., (2008) 2 SCC 409.

(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 25.08. 2025 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Anju Goel 2025.08.28 13:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh