Deepak Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.49701 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision: 04.10.2024 Deepak Kumar ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 17.08.2023 Sadar Pehowa, Kurukshetra 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 180, 120-B IPC, 1860 Seeking quashing of impugned order dated 14.05.2024 passed by Additional Sessions Court, Kurukshetra in the FIR captioned above whereby the bail of the petitioner under section 437(6) was dismissed, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 528 BNSS.

2.

State counsel opposes the present petition on the ground of maintainability while submitting that once a statutory remedy is available under section 483 BNSS, the extra ordinary jurisdiction under section 528 BNSS cannot be invoked. 3.

Faced with this, counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a petition seeking regular bail under section 483 BNSS straightaway in this Court, if so advised. 4.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 04.10.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No.

Sonia Puri 2024.10.05 12:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document