← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/45944/2025dismissed

Gautam Alias Goppu v. State Of Punjab

2025-08-22Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil6 pages

          

   

  



   

  

  

!" 

     "

 

 

 

   

  "#  $"% &'()&  

! 

"#$ % &

'

( )

 )

  $*$+ 

,- ' # . */ $*$0 

 1$2 # 12 +0 1$2 +++ +$"

1"2 % &

'&

  $*$+ (



 0  ! 344   15 62 $ 

 ,- 

6 

  

 

                       !"#$"   % &&'$$$$$'(  

  )  *+ ,'

 -$-.

,$/$$01() % " "(     )"

2   3 

 

  )  4 *    4))           )(

"  "5*    0 6$'6 706&8  2    )  5*4(

*"     )   2   

 "   5*  *  *  (*"

9 %% 

 1  496-.  :   

"

 %  *  " 

 "

% -/,.51 ,8$&-$-.( * "     2   ))   %   % 

 )9 %%     2  *

)

*9 %*

*    49) 

) 

*)* 5     *

2

 

*9)) )  *9  *))"  4(    2 

* " "  )* *  3

 " 

*   %* "( 

         " :"5*  *5")  "  (

 % ; 5



 

   

 <   9 *   

1=> 

    %   ) 9*

"



  1"%)    *

*?6

@1 % .&'$$$$$'A0 05(0 *   .  B,8$&-$-.0 *(C "/9 "(5( 0  )<>1  #8)    * ) *) *

  %   9* 9 %% 

 1 

*

 496-.   :   )    

  

3



% 

C  

* % * (5( 

)"  )

* )   %   



 (3

9 %% ( %)   

     *   9   *  *   9  %%         5  " ,.,8$&-$-.) *  " " *  (5(  )"

 )

* )  * )



 

         *  *  1=>  0>?.?-$-.    ,8$&-$-. 

      1=>    0>?&?-$-.,8$&-$-.

9  ) % (1=> 0>?.?-$-.,8$&-$-.

   *  *   $#3

(3

,# * % 3

"-* %% (1=>  0>?&?-$-.,8$&-$-.

9 *  *  

$,3

"93

"* %% D +D@  +%  A7

 * )%%     3

"7 % % %   

1=>

*  * ,,.@-A,,'@,A.,@-A-#@#A @.A   9%

)   < %

   *5  *    %

9+   )  **    % 

(5(  )"

 )

*  ) )*  *  * ?60 05(0 * B  .  B ,8$&-$-.9//.019 "0 * B  .  % ) 7 (

 >    * %  9 )   ) * " 7(>%  5(0 0 '?  

=?<



 &'

   9+



* 0 *<  >  % 

%"  > $,8$&-$-.E +,-),-.+,/ , 0)1'23 +3 -1) 4)-.-.+,)& 7 

!



 !!& 4!





8 

   

  

4!

 &

 4 4

-

(

4  ,-

(

 4 $"

 4 4

    &

' 4

, 0)1'23 +3 -1) -'-)56+742'.,',- 9

)( 3 

3!

  

 ! :

 4

!(  

   

4!

  4!&

 %

;  

!!& ) )

 %



4!

<  4

;! 

! &

 )

 )! 

)  

<

4 

!&

!( 9  (  4!&   

 &  4 "

,'2(/./ %

&



(  4  



 

  

;!! 

 4 ;

 =   !

!& ;



 

 

From the assertions made by the Learned State counsel, it is further evident that the name of the petitioner is specifically named in the FIR and specific overt act has been attributed to him. The petitioner participated in the attack by kicking the victim in stomach, while he was already injured and in no position to defend himself, thereby the making the simple act of merely kicking even graver.

 !  ; 5



"#$ %'

 $*$+  4; 5  &



5  5 

  (!&

4



-

> 

  

 5 3 !

 ;!!

 



& 

 =





!  ;! ( !& 4 (

;! 4   (

!!

4

!



4!

!&  

  !"" 

 #$%&&%'  



 F

 %

% *   " G%   ) *

! *  **  3 *     *

+

%%

"*   * %   *   )      

   %          * !  *  % )%"*

 * )  )" "

* *4 *     **        *"  

  "  % *  % %" * %

 *  

 % 

)"  %* )  * * *)

 



 %  9  

    

*         %* *   



 %G   *    

      **  3*      %

   )         *    !     H

8 ?( ;

!!(    !   & =

!

! ;

 5 

 4 

  - 4     4 4



 

! 4



  

(  4  4 / 8; 

   

!&   ( 

!

 3 



 

 @ 9

(!& $   "% 

 

  4  ?

  I? 4 % I?