High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/46943/2019dismissed

Rakesh Kumar Arya v. State Of Punjab And Another

2022-02-14Mrs. Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.105+208 CRM-M No. 46943 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.02.2022 Rakesh Kumar Arya ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ..Respondents (Heard through Video-Conferencing) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Samina Dhir, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.1-State.

Mr. DD Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-Bureau.

*** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA J. (Oral) CRM No.5180 of 2022 This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant- -petitioner for placing the copies of the orders, as passed in both the petitions previously filed by him, on the record as Annexures A-1 and A-2.

Notice in the application.

At the asking of the Court, learned State counsel and learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2-Bureau accept the notice and they submit that they have no objection in allowing the instant application.

POOJA SHARMA 2022.02.14 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No. 46943 of 2019 (O&M) -2Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reasons as mentioned in this application, the same is allowed and Annexures A-1 and A-2 are taken on the record.

CRM-M No.46943 of 2019 Learned counsel for respondent No.2-Bureau seeks an adjournment for filing the status-report, while submitting that though the same is ready but it is yet to be submitted with the Registry. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition but he prays that the trial Court be directed to decide the case pending before it, within some specific time frame.

Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2-Bureau have no objection for the same. Resultantly, the petition in hand stands dismissed for having been withdrawn.

However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial proceedings and decide the case, as pending before it, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 14.02.2022 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) pooja JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No POOJA SHARMA 2022.02.14 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document