Anju Rani v. Bhupender

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

TA No. 309 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 2.4.2019 ...

Anju Rani ................Applicant vs.

Bhupender .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr.Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the applicant. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) As per the office report, dasti notice has not been collected by learned counsel for the applicant. Vide last order, it was directed that service of respondent be got effected by taking dasti notice, clarifying that in case of default, the application would be liable to be dismissed. That direction has not been complied with. In view of the default, the application is dismissed for nonprosecution. ( H.S. Madaan ) 2.4.2019 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2019.04.02 14:02 I am the author of this document