Suman Arya And Others v. Union Of India And Others

264 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP -26425 of 2024(O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2025 Suman Arya and others ....Petitioners vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Parth Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of communication dated 13.02.2023 (Annexure P-8) whereby respondent has reduced the amount of revised pension and brought down to the ceiling of Rs. 6,500/-. 2.

Mr. Himanshu Bansal, Advocate submits that issue involved in the instant petition is no more res integra and is squarely covered by judgment dated 12.09.2024 passed by this Court in 'Inderjit Singh Kaknian and others Vs. Union of India and others', (CWP-10992-2023). PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.07.09 04:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP -26425 of 2024(O&M) -23.

On being confronted with the facts of the instant case and aforecited judgment, Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate expressed his inability to controvert applicability of said judgment to the facts of instant case. 4.

As issue stands settled by this Court in afore-cited judgment, the petition needs to be disposed of in the same terms. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 12.09.2024 (Supra).

5.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 09.07.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.07.09 04:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document