Maya Devi v. Manpal Singh And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3754-2024 Date of Decision: 04.11.2024 MAYA DEVI ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MANPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:

Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Udit Garg, Advocate for the respondents.

**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that compliance has been done.

In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition.

Dismissed as not pressed.

Rule stands discharged.

However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, she would be at liberty to raise her claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two weeks from the release of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two SANGEETA 2024.11.22 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-3754-2024 weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of respondent, the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner from his/her own pocket.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) November 04, 2024 JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2024.11.22 15:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document