← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/23622/2023disposed of

Ira Rohila And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others

2023-12-11Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

2023:PHHC:157778

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 109 Civil Writ Petition No.23622 of 2023 Date of Decision: December 11, 2023 Ira Rohila & others ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Vikas Sangwan, Advocate, with Ms. Monika Sangwan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

. . .

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant benefits of continuity of service to the petitioners for the service rendered by them in pre-allocated departments before the revised result, and also direct the respondents to count the break period due to procedural delay in their relieving and fresh appointment/re-joining towards all service benefits. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioners were earlier selected as Clerks pursuant to result dated 03.09.2020, and joined the posts as such. The result was, however, revised on 23.06.2022, and they were again selected for the same posts. The Government has issued instructions dated 21.04.2023, Annexure P-6, to the effect that prevous service of such Clerks who were recommended against AVIN KUMAR 2023.12.16 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.t

2023:PHHC:157778 CWP No.23622 of 2023 [2] Advertisement No.05/2019 in both the merit lists, shall be counted for the purpose of seniority and pay protection, irrespective of the fact that they have been allotted same or different department(s). Learned counsel, at this stage, submits that the petitioners will be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to decide petitioners' case in terms the aforesaid instructions by passing a speaking order.

3.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, contends that appropriate decision in terms of the instructions, dated 21.04.2023, will be taken to count the petitioners' service rendered prior to the revision of result and provide them continuity in service, within a period of three months. 4.

Disposed of accordingly.

(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge December 11, 2023 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2023.12.16 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.t