Arun Alias Shankar v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP No. 9553 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.10.2024 Arun @ Shankar ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. Harpreet Kaur, A.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

1.

Seeking extension of parole for six weeks, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under ArƟcle 226 of ConsƟtuƟon of India. 2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner confines his prayer to the extent that if he approaches the concerned authority for limited parole for operaƟon of his father, the same be decided posiƟvely within three days of its filing. 3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, the present peƟƟon is disposed of with liberty to the peƟƟoner to file an applicaƟon before the concerned Jail Superintendent for parole on 07.10.2024 and the concerned Officer is directed to decide the same on or before 12.10.2024. In case any favourable order is passed, in that case, the peƟƟoner shall be released on personal bonds to the saƟsfacƟon of the concerned Jail Superintendent. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.04 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh