Surinder Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CRM-M-50448-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-50448-2024 Date of Decision: October 14, 2024 Surinder Singh and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Ms.Komal Balain, Advocate for Mr.Harkirat Singh Bhogal, Advocate for the petitioners.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL) 1.

Present petition has been filed praying for issuance of direction for fair and impartial investigation/inquiry, as police Department is not taking any action on the application moved by the petitioner. 2.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have already given a complaint, dated 11.09.2024 (Annexure P-1), to respondent No.2, but the same has not been decided as yet.

3.

Notice of motion to the respondents.

4.

On asking of the Court, Mr.Tarun Aggarwal, Sr.DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State. 5.

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a MEENU 2024.10.16 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur,

CRM-M-50448-2024 -2Punjab, to look into the complaint, Annexure P-1, and decide the same expeditiously preferably within one month from today in accordance with law.

October 14, 2024 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2024.10.16 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document