Neeraj Bhalla v. State Of Haryana And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16136-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.09.2025 NEERAJ BHALLA ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Ms. Amanat Kullar, Advocate for Mr. Alankar Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.

.....

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has expired during the pendency of this petition. 2.

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

3.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 15.09.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi i) Whether speaking/reasoned?

Yes/No ii) Whether reportable?

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.09.17 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document