Savitri Devi v. Rajbala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH **** CR-1883-2017 Date of Decision.:22.04.2025 Savitri Devi Pe,,oner Vs.
Rajbala Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:
None.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Nobody is pung appearance on behalf of the peoner. As per order dated 09.05.2023, as nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the peoner, registry was directed to inform the counsel for the peoner. It is reported by the registry that Mr. D.K. Tuteja, Advocate for the peoner has been duly informed, through his e-mail. Sll there is no representaon on behalf of the peoner.
It appears that peoner is no longer interested in pursuing the present revision.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecuon.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE April 22, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.04.22 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document