Sukhwinder Kaur Alias Sukhwinder Kaur And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-11164-2022 Decided on : 29.11.2022 Sukhwinder Kaur alias Sukhvinder Kaur and another . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3, to provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 - Sukhwinder Kaur alias Sukhvinder Kaur, aged about 22 years and petitioner No.2 - Jaswinder Singh, aged about 30 years, have got married on 22.11.2022, against the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 6. It has been submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 22.11.2022 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, wherein, they have expressed their apprehension.

3.

Notice of motion.

JAWALA RAM 2022.11.29 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.

CRWP- 11164 -2022 - 2 - 4.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (State). 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, to look into the representation dated 22.11.2022 (Annexure P-6) qua threat perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. 6.

However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE November 29, 2022 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2022.11.29 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement.