Golu v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-25.03.2026 GOLU ......PETITIONER VS.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. T.P. Singh, Senior DAG, Haryana.
**** JASJIT SINGH BEDI , J.(ORAL ) 1.
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2.
On 19.05.2025, the following order was passed:- "i) Learned State counsel has filed status-cumcompliance report by way of an affidavit of Suresh Kumar, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Barara, District Ambala on behalf of respondent/State in Court today. Same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at appropriate place with the paper-book.
ii) Learned State counsel, upon reading out paragraphs No. 6 and 7 of the status report, submits that the ground on which four weeks' parole was sought no longer exists, as the petitioner's children were discharged from the concerned hospital after receiving the necessary medical treatment nearly a year ago. For reference, paragraphs No. 6 and 7 of the status report are reproduced below: "6. That in compliance of the above said order dated 16.12.2024, the local police officials of PP Kalalti, PS Mullana, visited the Kaushal Hospital at Kharar and met the concerned doctor/treating physician who treated one daughter namely Ruksana and son namely Vicky of the Petitioner-accused and informed the concerned doctor/treating physician about the present petition of
-2parole filed by the petitioner, who after going through medical records verified the facts that patient/daughter namely Ruksana (was admitted from 10.08.2024 to 13.08.2024 for operation) and patient/Vicky (was admitted from 31.05.2024 to 04.06.2024) in our Hospital and obtained the Discharge summary of the both the children of the accused-petitioner from the treating physician/doctor. For the sake of brevity, the accused-petitioner has already attached the medical records of all 3 of his children along with the present petition as Annexure P-1 and Annexure P4. However, in compliance of the above said order, the IO also obtained the copy of medical records of daughter/Ruksana and son/Vicky and the same are annexed herewith as Annexure R-1 (Discharge Summary of Ruksana) and Annexure R-2 (Discharge Summary of Vicky). 7.
That thereafter, in order to elicit the truth regarding the treatments/medical conditions of the children of the accusedpetitioner, the IO visited the place of residence of accusedpetitioner and after reaching there, the IO met the wife of the accused-petitioner, who informed the IO that in the month of May, 2024, her son was operated for hernia and her daughter was also got operated for broken bone due to which she became handicapped as she fell from stairs. For the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court, the true typed translation of the statement of the wife of the accused-petitioner dated 13.05.2025 is annexed herewith as Annexure R-3.
iii) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. iv) In the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 19.08.2025. v) Registry is directed to inform learned counsel for the petitioner about the next date fixed before this Court." 3.
A perusal of the aforementioned order would reveal that 04 weeks parole was sought as the petitioner's children were in hospital. They already stand discharged after medical treatment.
-34.
In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.
5.
Disposed of.
6.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) 25.03.2026 JUDGE Kusum Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No