Tanu And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others


 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10266-2023 Date of decision : 19.12.2023 TANU AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present :

Ms. Jasneet Mehra, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. R.K. Ambavta, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Tamanna Banwala, Advocate for respondents No.4 & 5. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Status report by way of affidavit of Umed Singh, HPS, DSP (HQ.) Kaithal has been filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 today in Court, which is taken on record. Copy supplied. 2.

Relevant para thereof reads as under :

"3.

That in pursuance of order dated 18.10.2023 passed by this Hon'ble court, it is submitted that an inquiry was conducted by ASI Amit Kumar. During the inquiry, on 17.10.2023, ASI Amit Kumar visited the village Jaswanti and inquired about the matter. During inquiry on 17.10.2023 the statement of respondents no. 4 and 5 were recorded who stated that both the petitioners are themselves responsible for their lives. They and their family members will not interfere in the personal life of petitioners, in any manner. They have also no objection if the petitioners live in a relationship. The statement of respondent no. 4 is annexed as Annexure-R-1, statement of respondent no. 5 is annexed as Annexure-R-2. During the inquiry statement of respondent no. 6 was also recorded. He also stated in his Deepak Kumar 2023.12.20 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-10266-2023 -22023:PHHC:163130 statement that the petitioners are major and understand their good and bad. He and his family members have no objection if the petitioners live in a relationship. Therefore during inquiry no threat perception was found to the life of petitioners from the respondents and other family members. The statement of respondent no. 6 is annexed as Annexure-R-3 for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. The report of the inquiry officer is annexed as Annexure-R-4 and the report of SHO is annexed as AnnexureR-5 for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court." 3.

State Counsel further submits that in FIR No.250 dated 09.08.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366/380 IPC at Police Station Sadar Kaithal, cancellation report has been prepared and the same shall be filed in due course of time. 4.

In view of the statements placed on record along with status report, nothing remains to be adjudicated at the hands of this Court in the present matter.

5.

Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

December 19, 2023 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Deepak Kumar 2023.12.20 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document