Surinder Singh v. State Of Punjab

 


    

 










$ 
@@?.3 @/
4
A
5
"!
,&%%"
?

3 /

 % %"


 


61

 













'",

 78



 

9














:
;$ $%$
,<"&$ 
!"
+
' % %"

  $=>$
 
1=$)

     

+
'
' % %"
+$
) 
!%*,
1,
& %"
?
"!
 
 
!"
#$
"!
$ %&%'$ "(
)$%* *
"
+
' % %"
%
&$

"


,$  ,
- .

/
#% ,
$
"

"*%&
 $ %"
$0+1
% %&
"2'1
1,
& %"


& 

3/
4& %"
3
"!

&
$,,,
*$ 
"5


On 28.08.2025, this Court had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel been implicated in the case disclosure statement of Bh whom the alleged recovery effected. He alleges false connection between him and involved in any other case.

by Hon'ble The Supreme Singh Vs. State of Tamil N

1. He is ready and willing t when required by the in cooperate.

submits that the petitioner has e as his name surfaced in the hinder Singh @ Bhinda from of 150 intoxicant tablets was implication as there is no d the said co-accused. He is not Relies on the judgment passed Court in the case of Toofan adu, 2021 (1) RCR (Criminal) to join the investigation as and nvestigating agency and will Notice of motion.

At the asking of th Punjab, accepts notice on be he Court, Mr. MS Bajwa, DAG, ehalf of respondent-State and PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.24 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

 

 !   on instructions from ASI Lakhwinder Singh, affirmed the factum of petitioner being not involved in any other case. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 09.09.2025. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to compliance of conditions as enshrined under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, it is clarified that if the petitioner does not join and cooperate with the Investigating Agency as required by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, this interim order shall be deemed to have been vacated. Adjourned to 24.09.2025."

3.

Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the aforementioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur.

4.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 5.

In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 28.08.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

6.

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him.


?

3 /









   '$<
01:$















 

B+ +
'$0%#C$",

9
C
"






B+ +
'" $)*







9
C
"





PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.24 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.