Sanjay Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 50574 of 2024 Date of Decision: 14.10.2024 Sanjay Sharma ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 25.06.2019 Sarai Khwaja, District Faridabad 406, 420, 506, 120-B IPC 1.

Seeking quashing of the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 482 CrPC.

2.

AŌer arguing for some Ɵme, counsel for the peƟƟoner wants to withdraw the present peƟƟon with liberty that he be permiƩed to file a discharge applicaƟon before the trial Court and the said Court be directed to answer each and every point so raised by him in the said applicaƟon.

3.

Given above, peƟƟoner is permiƩed to file a precise applicaƟon for discharge, but such applicaƟon should not be unnecessarily lengthy and if such applicaƟon is filed in that case, the concerned Court shall decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order and shall answer to each and every point taken in the said applicaƟon. This order is subject to the condiƟon that the peƟƟoner shall not seek any adjournment. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 14.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.16 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh