High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48479/2019allowed

Jeetan Prasad Mahato And Another v. State Of Punjab And Another

2022-04-05Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj9 pages

! "

"" JEETAN PRASAD MAHATO AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners #$% STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents & '(& )# ) *

! " # $ # ) * + $,- % &

! ' (( ) !%*+$,! -.

# / %$ /'

/%*! ! 0'$'/+%'1%* . (%'2/ 3 45

# 67! 8%9 ) ) )) 3 : !

) 3 ) )

# 6) 9 ! -.

3 ) ) ) . ! !

) )) ) 3 ! 3 3 ! !

-2- $ & 3 ., ;

/2 % /%* ) !

)) 3 3 . ) ) !

<! 45 # %2 /'

/% // &4 <! 45 ! 8

! " ! # $ " $$ # $ ## % & $ "' ( $ %) * + , & ( " -.##-/ "& ' 0 & $#

%0 00

# 0 $ #1# ## "' ( $2*+ , $ *+ ,2 '' 0 # "& % "$ 34"

-33' 2 &

$ %& "' ( $*+ , "&' 0 & $# &!5 (! ) =

! 5.6 $" 0 " $' &" "" 2 7 & 8.$2 # #2#6 "&&" $ ## 9 0 " $ $2 9 9 $ 9# / & '

(

& '

) '*3:" # $ $&'& ; =6 $ $ 0 & $' " &0 $ $&$ #< =-6& 0 $0

# " " 0' 7 $&2 "$ 7 $ $ & 0&' $ 0$ # = > " ' " $ =-/ $ 2 # #2# & &

-4- & 8.$2 # #2# =6 ?$ "0 # $ $ & 8.$2 # #2# & $ 9$ $ 9#! & 0 ' @ $ " & " 2 " 7 ' & 8.

$2 # #2#0$ "& #6 0 " ' "7 $ & "$ $ 0&$ & ' $'# ==60"$ "0 " 2 # #2#&$$ & $2 8.# " 2 & & ?

' 0 @ " $$ &' " =-$2 # #2# 0"$& $ # =8 6 & 8. $ 2 # #2# " 7 A7@!" 0 " $ $ 2 # 6 " 70 $ @ " 3' 2 0 7 & # & & $ $#6& 8.

-5- "& & & ' ' $ $ 2 & 0 '0 $ $$ " &$$ & 0' # & 3 ,! ! ) 3 >?

!)(! ) +

* $

!!# !

7 3! '3!)) @

!) (! ) = - .

/ # #

12$* )7 ! $1'6" & '$ "

" $&' ; $1'$ 8. 0 & $3'2 0"$ $ $ #6 0$ && # ' 0& & 3'2 B $1'

60$ $3'2 ? $ ' ' " 0"&$$ 00$ $ $'$$#*' $$ & $ '0 " 0$ =-$2$2 /C=#6& ? 8. 0$$$@ "# $1'! $ ' & ' "?7 $ 8. 3'2 0& $

& $7 $ & B $1'2 * & $3'2 &"

-6- " 7 B $

0"$ $ B $1'%6& $

" ? ' $$ 0 0 00 $ $70" $ "$ B $1'1

7 $ & 8. & ' & " 3' 2 0 ' ' 0 $ $$#3 $$00' 0 $$ "?'0 $$ 00#$$ '

0 "0 #6 & $ 0 ' $ " ' $ $$B $1'

' $ $$ " & 0 0 &' $0#6$' $ 7 $ & ? B $1'3 2 00' $$ & $ $ &0$0 $$ ?'& 0B $1'0

3' 2 ? '$0&$ "& "$0 $ '& B $1'$ 6 7 D#. D#/ "0# A $$ 00' $ &@"' $ 0 & " $ "& 0#63'2 &" $

-7- '?& $$ 000 $ $ @ # 6 ? $ $ $ &&'"# + . 3 ) !

! ) !!!3! ! & ! " 3 ! ) '

& >A !) (! ) 4"# 5

)67869

3!* ) 3 @ ! ) 3 ! ! 7

) )) ! ! ! ,! 3 3! !

(! ,! -.

3 ) ) & >A !)(! 7 ! =/#* =-2 # #2# & 2 ? ' " "& $ $$ E"4 & $ & 7 @ & 3' 2 8.2 # #2# 0 2 8$ 2 " 0 " " $ =-2 # #2# > & & $&'"7 $ 7$?' ' " '; > $$$$$$B $ $ B F $ "& 0B G 2 $ $

-8- $ $$ ) 0 # * ! 3 ! ! 3 3" ) ) !

# 3 3 3"

& ! ,! ! ) ! ! &) ) ! ! . "

(! ( ! " !

8 !

& ) " ! !

! & ) ! ) ! ! ) . !

! ) ) ! ) ! B ! -.

,! 3 /%*3 ) ) !

! ! )

" ! . " ! ) ) ) !

) " ! !

10.

Considering the facts of the instant case and noticing the principles laid down by the Apex Court in "Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and another", (2012) 10 SCC 303, "Ramgopal and another versus State of Madhya Pradesh" reported as 2021 SCC ONLINE SC 834 and also by the Full Bench of this Court in "Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another", 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, that the dispute involved in the instant case pertains to offences under Sections 458, 380,

-9427, 148, 149 of the IPC which cannot be perceived as falling within the prohibited category or as an offence that is heinous and grossly shocking to the conscience of the Court or having a wide pervasive impact on the social or public order, the instant petition is allowed and the case bearing FIR No.220 dated 13.08.2019 for offences punishable under Sections 458, 380, 427, 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Dera Bassi, District S.A.S. Nagar Mohali (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed, qua the petitioners in light of the compromise. However, the same would be subject to payment of costs of Rs. 10,000/- by each petitioner to be deposited with the "Punjab and Haryana High Court Lawyers Welfare Fund" within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

3 +# ) *-

( ."

"" F C "

ED# C

ED#