Ravi Kant v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-47526 of 2019 .....

Date of decision:28.11.2019 Ravi Kant .....Petitioner v.

State of Punjab .....Respondent ....

Present:

Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Sewak, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

.....

Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral):

Learned State counsel on instructions from the police official who is present in Court to assist him, submits that pursuant to the order of this Court dated November 07, 2019, the petitioner has joined investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required presently. That being so, this petition is allowed, with the order dated November 07, 2019, granting interim bail to the petitioner, made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

However, the aforesaid order will not be treated to be an observation of this Court on the merits of the case, but only in view of the fact that the investigating agency itself has stated that it does not require HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.12.02 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-47526 of 2019 [2] custodial interrogation of the petitioner.

Naturally, the complainant would be at liberty to avail of his remedy as regards any grievance, including the investigation process. November 28, 2019.

(Amol Rattan Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2019.12.02 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh