Surjit Kaur v. State Of Punjab

CR-6539 9-2017 (O&M) [1] 101 (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN NJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG CR Da aur

VERSUS

Punjab & anr.

ARH R-6539-2017 (O&M) ate of Decision: 03.09.2025 Surjit Ka State of

...Petitioner

...Respondent

ts

CORAM

Present:

: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H HARKESH MANUJA :

Mr. Sukhdeep Singh Sidh Mr. Sohailbir Singh Sidhu, for the petitioner.

u, Advocate & Advocate Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl.A.

Mr. Karan Gupta, Advocate (CM-7955-CI-2019) **** .G., Punjab.

e for the applicant/ BDA.

HARKES CM-7955 SH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 5-CI-2019 For the reasons mentione d in the application, the same e is allowed.

Bathinda Development Au uthority, Bhagu Road, Bathin nda through its Additional Chief Administr ator is ordered to be implead ded as respo ndent No.2.

Amended memo of parties s is taken on record. Registry y to tag the s ame at appropriate place.

MAIN CA ASE:

In view of the order pa ssed in 9153-CI-2017 in R RFA No.1272- -2002, titled as Surjit Kaur V Vs. State of Punjab, no furt her

CR-6539 9-2017 (O&M) [2] cause su urvives in the present petit ion and as such the same e is disposed d of.

2.

Pending misc. applicatio on(s), if any, shall also sta and disposed d of.

03.09.20 sanjay ( HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasone Whether reportable ?

ed ?

Yes/No Yes/No