Sushil Kumar v. Vishram Kumar Meena, Ias

E HIGH COURT OF PUNJ IN THE JAB AND HARYANA ARH COCP-3275-2023 Decision: October 03, 2024 AT CHANDIGA Date of D ........Petitioner SUSHIL KUM VISHRAM KU CORAM: HO

Present:

Mr MAR

Versus

UMAR MEENA, IAS .......Respondent ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARK KESH MANUJA r. Vikas Sonak, Advocate for t the petitioner.

Mr Ms HARKESH MA r. Pravindera Chauhan, Advoc s. Vasundhra Asija BHandari, cate with Advocate for respondent.

**** ANUJA, J. (ORAL) Le earned counsel for the resp pondent submits that order r dated 09.05.2 2023 has now been complied d with by passing a speaking g order dated 26 6.09.2024.

In view of the aforesaid, learn ed counsel for the petitioner r does not pres s the present petition with libe erty to challenge the same in n accordance w with law Dis smissed as not pressed with a aforesaid liberty.

Ru ule discharged.

03.10.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasone (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE ed Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.10.04 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document