Inderjeet v. State Of Punjab And ORS

 

    


 



  

  (278)
 



 !

"# $!%&'&"(  )* * + Inderjeet ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and ors.

...Respondents

  , - * .


. .

 

Present:

Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.

Detenue(Anu is present in person.

**** . .

 / *

- The prayer in the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to to produce the detenue(Anu, aged 17 years wife of the petitioner before this Court. 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that, initially, the alleged detenue(Anu wife of the petitioner had been sent to Snehalaya, Sector 15, Chandigarh as she was a minor. Now she is a major and therefore, she be allowed to accompany the petitioner(Inderjeet who is her husband.

3.

The learned counsel for the State contends that, though, the detenue(Anu was a minor at the time when the instant petition was filed, she has now turned major and this Court may pass appropriate orders. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.05.05 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

 

  4.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 5.

As the alleged detenue(Anu was a minor she had been directed to stay at Snehalaya, Sector 15, Chandigarh. Subsequently, she was asked to be present in the Court on account of the fact that she has turned a major. She has appeared in the Court today and states that she wishes to accompany the petitioner who is her husband and is also present in the Court.

6.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to take along his wife(Anu who is now a major. 7.

The pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

. .

 

  )* * +

sukhpreet Whether speaking/reasoned:( Yes/No Whether reportable:( Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.05.05 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh