Jeet Ram v. State Of Haryana And Others
CWP-25081-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-25081-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Jeet Ram ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present:
Mr. Omkar Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.
Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to release pensionary benefits of the petitioner with immediate effect along with interest @ 18% from the date of accrual till its actual realization. Further prayer has been made to direct respondents No.1 to 3 to decide the representation dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-6), filed by the petitioner. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.2 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.
MOHD YAKUB 2025.09.04 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh
CWP-25081-2025 3.
Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.3, appearing on advance notice, submits that he has no objection, in case a direction is issued to the respondent No.2 for timebound consideration and decision of the representation dated 18.07.2025 of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 4.
Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.2.
5.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 04.09.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.09.04 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh