← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/25063/2025disposed of

Icici Home Finance Company Limited v. Additional District Magistrate Cum District Collector Gurdaspur

2025-08-27The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry2 pages

CWP-25063 of 2025 

            

  !"#"$%&'('   )  ) *)  +'

"

"$, -./   * /  )/  )/   ** 0

/

  /' + #1$ $ #      )%  2*) ' //* 0  /    2*) ' //-

0    



         

   

        

!!!!

/* 0  /3 , 1.

The present writ petition has been filed by petitioner-Financial Institution aggrieved by non-execution of the order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Gurdaspur under the provisions of Section 14 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act for brevity). 2.

It is rather surprising that Circle Revenue Officer, Dhariwal through Tehsildar, Gurdaspur i.e. Respondent No.2 has failed to discharge his statutory duty of assisting and handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner-Financial Institution.

2.1 Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) are a huge burden on the public exchequer, banking and financial system, and, thus, prompt enforcement of recovery mechanism under the SARFAESI Act is paramount for liquidity in the system.

KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.29 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-25063 of 2025 3.

In view of the above, this court by way of writ of mandamus directs Circle Revenue Officer, Dhariwal through Tehsildar, Gurdaspur i.e. Respondent No.2 to execute the order dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act by handing over physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner Bank as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of 30 days. The petitioner bank, thereafter, can proceed to adopt all possible legitimate means to liquidate the secured asset to recover the due amount. 4.

The petition for the time being stands disposed of in the terms aforesaid. Needless to say that the guidelines laid down by Coordinate Bench in Bank of Maharashtra Vs. District Magistrate, Hisar And Others [CWP-70182022 decided on 28.05.2024] be adhered to by the concerned authorities. 5.

We hasten to add that this order shall however be subject to any restraint/ interim/ final order which may have been passed by any judicial forum, in favour of the borrowers/ guarantor/ any aggrieved person, who is party to this lis.

3/* 5   /         3/-

5   &'(' 4 $ 8" Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.29 11:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document