← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48005/2019allowed

Pal Singh And ORS v. State Of Punjab And Others

2021-12-02Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh4 pages

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING Date of Decision: 2.12.2021 I.

CRM-M-48005-2019 Pal Singh and others

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

II.

CRM-M-48030-2019 Shakuntla Devi and others ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH

Present:

    

!



 ## 

!



 # $ %& % $' ()*  ***** KARAMJIT SINGH , J.

+!

&%% !

&

,

!-

)

/0

( ,

!

1) !-

 





# 0!% $!

 

!!

.  .!

  

3 4)

(5

+



! 3

&

! 

. % 6   ) ! ).

&  &

%% -

  

!

)!

!

!5



 .

!



)!

*)

%%

. &

3  

!!

! 

  ( % #-

 *) &  

%% -

  

!

)!

!

!5



 .

 ( %

( % #-

)!

*)

.

7

 

 )  )- !

)!

%

%

,  

*



!

1) !

!!

.  .!

&  

&

 !

 

 )

 &

!

,

! 

. %

 )- !

# ) %

$    3 

5 

- .

.

%-



 !

,

      &   $)-

)!

%. , 

-

 %  )60%%  -!

& 

! !

%%



 & -

- )

 %,

&!

.  .!

0

. %



 )

8)  %  -!

! % !!

% - & ! !

 

 &   !



.  .!

!

- )

&

))

%)



, !

 I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners and for respondents No.2 in both the cases are ad idem that in view of the settlement effected between the parties, the present petition deserves to be accepted. It has also come on record that the aforesaid compromise is genuine and the parties effected the same without any undue influence or coercion. From the perusal of the report submitted by the Court concerned, it appears that Kartik had not appeared in the said Court to get record his statement. Counsel for the parties submitted that he being minor, there was no need to record his statement as he is being represented by his mother Shakuntala Devi. Counsel for the parties further contended that on behalf of Kartik, his mother Shakuntala Devi is competent to enter into compromise and accordingly, she made statement before the Court concerned.

I am of the view that the aforesaid compromise is in the welfare and interest of the parties and will enable the parties to live in peace and enjoy their life in a dignified manner. Also there is no legal impediment in translating their wishes into reality by putting an end to the criminal prosecution initiated on the basis of FIR in question. /

!

 - -

% & % & , :%

  )    

    

35  3. %5 

/

8)- ;



!

 )      

   <35  3. %5

 

%% &

 







# 0!% $! and all the subsequent proceedings are hereby quashed qua the petitioners in both the petitions

Needless to mention that both the parties will abide by the terms and conditions of the compromise Annexure P-3 in letter and spirit.   

      ! ).

=

-6

> ?

= 

 %

> ?