Jagir Singh And ORS. v. State Of Punjab And ANR



  
       
  

 

!

"#$#%& '()'')    *

   *)

))))

# #% +$ , +$-$

*       

))) $.%!

% $
&  /0 *) *
 

*

 

 
 
  



  



 
 

 
!"
 


# $



*



)2+
 %


 



!
&'$
(  (


"

*+,
# $
 
 - $-$$

!
&$-
./01
$-1
&2' &/
3
&/.
+(
4

!
&2'
&/
3
&/.
+(

 
5 "


! 
6

 
7
!!
# 

"

 )  
"
"






  $ -0 $-$&
48 
$5

$ 9 
 
 


 


"
 "

   .

%
( 

 "





  :

- $-$&


 

 


 
( ;+

"  
"

 

"






$

















&  




 


 
&  $-$&
 
 


 
7

!
< "
!!
# 
4 5
  


 

 
 
 




  




 

 
 
 

 
 

  


=
 

 

 

*+,

) 

)



%


 


" 
 
=
 
 




:

%
* 



( 






    

   

!

"#

 
9"
( 
 
 
 !
&'$
(  (



 "

1  





 


9"
( 




 

 

) 












 

 

 

%
 

)

"




  
 
 9> 

!


( 


 

$





       "

%

!

#% 
 
 
 


  













( 
  
 


=

( 

)


 
"



1 
 


%
 



:/


 
"  
  1
"57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised

.

















in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court. xxx xxx xxx. "

/ +



1
"
 "



  
( 
"

"
 

 

45


1   

( 

 
)

"

*+,



)  


1  
 

 










=

 


 

  

% 

 
 
 



 "


"




 





 
" 


 



)

 '

,  =




 

*+,
# $
   - $-$$

!
&$-
./01
$-1
&2'
&/
3
&/.
+(
4
1 
!
&2'
&/
3
&/.
+(

 
5
"


! 
61

 
7
!!
# 




)  
"



)


45






 
$ -0 $-$& 48 
$5
 

 =



, ----;1




 
 
? 
* 
 + @,
( "









"
  
 45

=

 





*

4 '()'') 



%!

.

?


"; 

A;# ?
, 

A;#