Sandeep v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRM-M No. 51393 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 51393 of 2024 Date of Decision: 18.10.2024 Sandeep ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana (through V.C.). **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 10.08.2024 Matlauda, District Panipat 109(1), 351(2), 61 of BNS, 2023 and 25 of Arms Act 1.

Seeking issuance of appropriate direcƟons to the official respondents No.2 to 4 to conduct invesƟgaƟon in the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 528 BNSS.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that respondent No.5 is interfering in the invesƟgaƟon.

3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, the Superintendent of Police is directed to supervise the invesƟgaƟon and if in his opinion, the invesƟgaƟon needs to be transferred, he may do so.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.21 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 51393 of 2024 5.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 6.

PeƟƟon is allowed with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 18.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.21 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh