Aman v. Union Territory Chandigarh And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11510-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.12.2022 AMAN

...Petitioner

Versus

UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ANR ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Ankit Chahal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Vij, APP UT Chandigarh.

Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.315 dated 30.07.2018, registered under Sections 380 and 411 IPC, at Police Station Sector-31, Chandigarh, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 26.09.2018 (Annexure P-2).

Vide order dated 02.09.2022 passed by this Court, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate had been directed to record the statements of the parties with regard to the genuineness and authenticity of the compromise.

In compliance thereof, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chandigarh, has submitted a report, vide letter dated 08.12.2022, which indicates that the parties have not come present for recording their statements.

AMAN JAIN 2022.12.12 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M-11510-2019 (O&M) -2Upon this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition, at this stage. Dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.

12.12.2022 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2022.12.12 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.