Santosh Gupta And ANR v. Surjit Singh And ORS

R.A. No.214-CII of 2017 in -1FAO No.709 of 1998

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH R.A. No.214-CII of 2017 in FAO No.709 of 1998 Date of Decision.07.05.2018 Santosh Gupta and another ........Appellants Vs Surjit Singh and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Salil Dev Singh Bali, Advocate for the applicant-appellants.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL) The prayer in the application is for reviewing the order dated 08.09.2017.

The arguments raised by the counsel for the review applicant-appellants tantamount to reagitating the issue, which is not the scope of the review as the ingredients of Section 114 and Order 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not envisage such grounds. There has to be an error apparent on the face of record, which has not been brought to the notice of this Court, much less, it tantamounts to reagitate the points which have been raised and addressed, in view of the ratio decidendi culled out by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association Vs. S.K. Roy, The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and another" 2016 (9) SCC 366. PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.05.11 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

R.A. No.214-CII of 2017 in -2FAO No.709 of 1998 In view of the aforementioned, the review application is dismissed.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE May 07, 2018 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2018.05.11 12:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document