Punjab And Sind Bank v. Debts Recovery Tribunal Iii

CWP-25102 of 2025



    
       

 !"!#$%&%& 

'
( )&

!

!# * +,' '  + 
 -


.
   '& )

"/# # "      0$  1-0 & '
'- .
  '
    1-0 & '
'
+

.  




          

'- .
  '
2 * 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner-Bank challenges the order dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P-13) passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Chandigarh, contending that the petitioner has a very good case on merits, by pointing out to certain grounds, which reveals that the DRT-III, Chandigarh, has travelled beyond its jurisdictional purview.

2.

Be that as it may, even if the petitioner has a very good case on merits, that alone, cannot be a good ground for the petitioner to invoke the power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution. 3.

We realise that if an order passed by any Tribunal is bereft of jurisdiction, then the power of judicial review can be exercised. 4.

However, t   !"   #    $ $    "    %     # $    "  $  &  $  % $ ' $  KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.29 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-25102 of 2025  "      (     !) " 

  *!  ! )  +" ,)   -"

.

- &     )     /      !     001      ,* 2'

 -  ,* 2'

 0330  !   $   )      ) ! ! "  ! "  +" ,) -" +,-

   +" ,)   -"

+, -

' $   " ")           +, -

 )       

2'- 4 
  '
         2'
+

4   %&%& ( 3 #6! Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No KAMAL GANDHI 2025.08.29 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document