Ram Avtar @ Kalu And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR
!"
# $%&%!'(
)
)
* + ,- .
)))) % %!' /& * /&0&
.
))) &1!'# ' & ( 2- .) . ,
.
!
" #
,
.
) )3/ $! %&#' '
( )*+" ,,-## ,# #,#, .#..#%.%/,0 %&%-*'1.#0*'2 3" 1 4 3 )*+2( ! ,/ ,- #,#%15 6#2
# 7 .
$ ' % , #,#%!' 8*(
# % #- , #,#% ! 9 '" ! ! ! 4! )*+( (
$ ! 4 / $) '
!
"#7' %&#' '
6 ! ( 7' ( !
$ ( 7:! ' $
"
%
!
#% ! !
' ! !4' ( ! $ /;
6 "57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.
. Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court.
xxx xxx xxx. "
;
* 6 ' ! ! 12 ' ( )*+ ( ! !! 4 $ ! !( & + 4 )*+" ,,- ## ,# #,#, .#..#%.%/,0%&%-*'1.#0 *'2 3"
1 4 3 )*+2 ( ( ( 12! 15 #2 ! 4 + ,,,,86! <) * =+'
3,
.
5
)
)
'# 1 <>8
?8" <+!
?8"