Sheela v. Raju
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION :- March 18, 2019 Sheela ...Applicant
Versus
Raju
...Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Rajesh Kumar Dadwal, Advocate for the applicant. *** Applicant Sheela, aged about 26 years, estranged wife of Rajurespondent, presently residing with her parents at Hoshiarpur on account of matrimonial discord between the spouses by way of filing the instant application seeks transfer of petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by her husband Raju against her having title 'Raju Vs. Sheela' pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Panchkula to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Hoshiarpur. According to the applicant, the marriage performed between the parties on 5.1.2011 ran into rough weather in connection with demand of dowry by respondent and his family members from her. The couple was not blessed with any child.
The circumstances were so created by the respondent and his family members that the applicant had to leave her matrimonial home and start residing with her parents at Hoshiarpur. She has filed petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the respondent in the Court at Hoshiarpur. She being a young woman, having no source of income, it is difficult for her to travel from Hoshiarpur to Panchkula, therefore, the application be accepted.
Notice of the application was given to the respondent, who as per office report has been duly served but he has not turned up to offer a contest. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant besides going through the record.
The Apex Court in various judgments has observed that in matrimonial disputes between the spouses convenience of wife should be looked into. In that regard a reference can be made to authority Sumita Singh Versus Kumar Sanjay and another, 2002 AIR(SC) 396 by a Division Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court.
In Bhartiben Ravibhai Rav Versus Ravibhai Govindbhai Rav, 2017(3) RCR(Civil) 369, the Apex Court had allowed application for transfer of the divorce petition to a place where the wife was residing considering various factors including the distance between the place where the wife was residing and the place of sitting of the Court where divorce petition had been instituted and the fact that the wife had filed two cases against her husband in the Court at the place of her residence wherein the respondent had already put in appearance.
In Apurva Versus Navtej Singh, 2017(2) Law Herald 966 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, it was observed that wherever the Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer in matrimonial disputes, the Courts have to take into consideration various factors like economic soundness of either of the parties, the social strata of the spouses to which they belong and behavioural pattern, standard of life antecedents of marriage. Generally it is the wife's convenience, which must be looked at by the Courts while deciding the transfer application.
Keeping in view the contentions in the application and
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, in which I find merit, in absence of any strong circumstance to the contrary, it would be proper and appropriate if the application is accepted. The same is accordingly allowed. The petition in question is ordered to be withdrawn from the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Panchkula and transferred to Family Court at Hoshiarpur for disposal in accordance with law. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear in the transferee Court on 29.4.2019. Copies of orders be sent to the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Panchkula as well as to the Family Court at Hoshiarpur for information and necessary compliance. (H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE March 18, 2019 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No