Amit v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-56033-2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-56033-2018 Date of decision: 24.01.2019 Amit ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Aditya Sangi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAGA, Haryana.

Mr. DN Ganeriwala, Advocate for the complainant. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for complainant-Tarwinder Singh, has filed Vakalatnama on his own, though he has not been impleaded as party. The same is taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 185 dated 21.10.2014, registered under Sections 341, 307, 302, 506/34, 148 and 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, Police Station Salhawas, District Jhajjar.

Heard.

Considering the fact that the material witnesses have supported the prosecution case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

RISHU KATARIA 2019.01.25 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-56033-2018 -2Dismissed.

However, in the fitness of things, the trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial expeditiously and conclude the same within six months January 24, 2019 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.01.25 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document