Shailender v. State Of Haryana And Another


 



  








 

 








 
 










!
"#$%$ &'
()*(*



           



    

 

        

  '
 +,
 *
 -
  -
-
,,
  

         !"    

     

 #$



 %     
....

  -
-
,,/
*
 ,

   

     & # '()
*+ 


,
**
- #



 " +*+*,
*./(  "

  '  0 

   1 " '  0  

     0 &

  "

 #   # 

       0  "     

  !    "     


+

*2

3 .4
(     ""&

   

"      

0   !

#  # #  (!

 

  

"     



!

#

  #  "

  "

 Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as State of Karnataka and Another vs Pastor P. Raju cited at 2006 (3) RCR (Criminal) 859, has held that the High Court is not to quash the FIR when the matter is MANGAL SINGH 2022.12.14 07:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.


 


  under investigation by the Police. The relevant extracts from the aforesaid judgment would read as under:-

20. "Thus the legal position is absolutely clear and also settled by judicial authorities that the Court would not interfere with the investigation or during the course of investigation which would mean from the time of the lodging of the Fir Information report till the submission of the report by the officer in charge of police station in court under Section 173(2) Criminal Procedure Code, this field being exclusively reserved for the investigating agency.

21. This being the settled legal position, the High Court ought not to have interfered with and quashed the entire proceedings in exercise of power conferred by Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code when the matter was still at the investigation stage." 0



0  

  0!

 #        # #    '(      

          

3" !

 

!

      !

# # #

" (  

 6     7 #

      

    

 #

"

 #  

   #  6       #   !

#  6

  "

    ( ! 6 0!



 # 

   

   



0  



       
  -
-
,,
()*(*










 








  8 

 

9 : #; < 9)   8 

  0 ;   < 9)    MANGAL SINGH 2022.12.14 07:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.