Amit Alias Lukka v. State Of Haryana
IOIN-CRM-M-10127-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IOIN-CRM-M-10127-2017 Date of Decision: May 19, 2017 Amit @ Lukka
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present:
Ms. Swati, Advocate for Mr. Jarnail S.Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kuldip Tiwari, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. *** Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral) In terms of the order dated 25.04.2017, another affidavit of the Superintendent of Police, Panipat, has been filed in Court today by the learned State counsel, a perusal of which shows that a departmental inquiry has also been ordered against the Inspector/Incharge, CIA-1, Panipat, for not getting the Test Identification Parade done, despite the fact that it was required in the case in question.
Without making any further comment on the aforesaid, with the departmental proceedings obviously to be taken to their logical conclusion, this petition in which bail was already granted to the petitioner vide the last order of this Court dated 25.04.2017, is finally disposed of. (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) JUDGE May 19, 2017 Sunil Devi Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No SUNIL DEVI 2017.05.23 14:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document