Sito Devi v. State Of Haryana And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RFA No.100 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision :27.05.2020 Smt. Sito Devi ... Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Haryana & another ... Respondents CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate Mr. M.K. Chauhan, Advocate Mr. P.C. Dhiman, Advocate Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Advocate Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Gehlawat, Advocate Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate Mr. Rajan Gupta, Advocate Mr. P.L. Singla, Advocate Mr. S.K. Loura, Advocate Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Aditya Grover, Advocate Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate Ms. Kuldeep Kaur, Advocate Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate Mr. S.S. Kaliramna, Advocate Mr. Akash Sridhar, Advocate for Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate and for Mr. M.S. Kundu, Advocate, for the landowners. Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, Addl. A.G., Haryana Mr. Abhinash Jain, AAG, Haryana, Ms. Vibha Tiwari, AAG, Haryana, for the State. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate, for Shri Mata Mansa Devi Shrine Board.

Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel, for Union of India. ***** G.S. Sandhawalia , J.

The appeal is disposed of in terms of detailed judgment of even date passed in RFA No.1817 of 2019 titled as "The Akash Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd.-II Vs. State of Haryana & others". (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) 27.05.2020 JUDGE parveen Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.05.27 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document phhc