Jagmohan Singh And Another v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.201 CRM-M No.48746 of 2019 Date of Decision: 01.07.2021 Jagmohan Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

(Heard through Video-Conferencing) CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. R.K. Arya Advocate, for the petitioners.

Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) The petitioner herein has sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case as registered at Police Station Tibber, District Gurdaspur vide FIR No.0085 dated 04.11.2019 under Sections 324, 323, 341, 34 IPC wherein the offence under Section 326 IPC is stated to have been added later on.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Rashpal Singh of Police Station Tibber, District Gurdaspur, submits that in compliance of the order dated 28.11.2019, both the petitioners had joined in the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required. In view of the above-discussed submission of learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as NEETU RANI 2021.07.01 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.48746 of 2019 -2- ......

extended to both the petitioners vide the said order dated 28.11.2019, is made absolute.

However, the petitioners shall continue to join in the investigation as and when required to do so and shall also strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 01.07.2021 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETU RANI 2021.07.01 19:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh