Mahabir Parshad Aggarwal v. State Of Haryana And Others
CWP-37633-2018 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP-37633-2018 Date of decision: - 19.12.2018 Mahabir Parshad Aggarwal ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present:- Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming the re-fixation of his pay in view of the orders of this Court passed in CWP No.5563-A of 1989 and CWP No.16084 of 1997 which were upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, vide order dated 08.12.2015 (Annexure P-9).
Petitioner claim that he is similarly situated with those who have been granted the relief by this Court but the same has not been granted to him only on the ground that he has not approached this Court and was not the petitioner in above mentioned writ petitions. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case, a time bound direction is given to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 11.05.2018 (Annexure P-14). NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.21 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-37633-2018 -2Keeping in view the request made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and entitlement of the petitioner in respect of the claim made in the writ petition/legal notice, the respondents are directed to decide the legal notice dated 11.05.2018 (Annexure P-14) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any relief, the same shall also be released to him within a period of next three months.
Present writ petition stands disposed of .
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) December 19, 2018 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking?
Yes Whether reportable?
No NARESH KUMAR 2018.12.21 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh