← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/48379/2025allowed

Kanwar Pal Singh @ Kanwar Pal Singh Gill v. State Of Punjab And Another

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj10 pages



       CRM-M-48379-2025 

! "!"# KANWAR PAL SINGH @ KANWAR PAL SINGH GILL 

 STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER    $  %&$  '( '  ) *****    

 

    !"

# $% 

&  

 !  ''''' ( '  )+ , -./ ( )              *+   & )!" ,  ,   -.   / "  01 ! (-+  (.-2-*     .(+324  .2(34   &!   -.   

5 !"   

"6

%/    "  " 7 %  7 7(-+-* 3

8 4

  9   6        %   

   :  ;1

/ "     -(-<-*   :      "   7   "  "   7 7 

 %6       " 6

  .       

   %   7  = "  (9:

  7 ! (>.-<-* 9 8        ? 

           

          

   

   

     !  "# "$ %"%&

 '(  '   )                    '        *+,   - #".  #/ "0 %"%&      /#. 102) /0#1%2  - 

       3

 4 -     

   

     

      

)/% ' )        

) 

  5  -    )3

* 6 - 

        ')

 

    

 -'       7   



 )  '    '     

    '    +  )    8 '        

  

  *+,      *+,' 9     

  '

4 

 

 84

.    

          

   

       '   *+, - #". #/ "0 %"%&   /#.102)/0#1%2- 

     3

4-   

                  

    - #:%;4) 7 - )    7

)    3

 4 -  -   

        ')

 

                -'      7   



  )  '    '

     '    '4   

 8 +  !

 +

         ' 

    

       *+,  #".  #/ "0 %"%&)      /#. 102) /0#1%2  - 4 )

       

  '                 

       

        

  7 

 ' 

'     

  '

     *+, 7 

' 

 <

 '             4

                     *+, 7

  '     '  

   

          



  

 ' '    

2 *        +   !

  + 

   )          *+,  

'  

    '        

  

   

' 

 <

 '       4  

   <

     '     

 

'

  *   +!   

           <                      4

  ')   

  = 2 @

           7    7 77 "      )   %$       7 "  5.



&  , appears on behalf of respondent No. 2 and reiterates the settlement and her concurrence to the FIR and all the other consequential proceeding being quashed.  90

&  :   7  >



     

         

  

 

!

""

 #

$%

 %

    (1%.27  )   '      '    '

  

   ?

    0.%

7'    



        )

)@     

'  @ @   

@

* 1%$2+& '

(

  '

& '

 

 

 ) '* ( 

 +' ) A  '   

   

    >7       

 

    '    )       )  '                = 1/"2 7      



   ' 

    '





   '

 +   '

    

  ' )?

   

 )   

     ) ?

  '     '         8 



   

1/#2 -  )        /%"1$2  

)  '     )         0.%

1/%27  

)    ')



9  '  '

 +

 



        0.%  

        



)  )     '    

)    '

 @      

@  3

  

     

     

 ) ; )           '     '    ' ?

    0.%

   

)

 ' 

   

7    '      

?

  ) '    '      

  

     

 '             

 1//27' 

  

  



 

  '  



          

       0.% *  )                    9         ;

            /%"

)          

1/02 7       0.%  

   ?

C?;3 A     

   7    ?



    ;        8  ?



  

 +   '

      

       7       0.%  

     

   )        ?

   '            7 ?

   

      7  



? ;   '

            7   '        

 ) '  ;

    '   '

,  

''    

       )   )

         

   

  

  



     

  

 '    '

> 9 "     6 / " $"7  6   

%)A B%  7:   7  (+



, 

      *1 $

$

!!- 

  

 %      8  "   6      2+ 6

> 77 C %)  A B%   7 :      7   B  

. /    #    #      

 

+      $

 23$-' 8.

1       6   7%       7 "           6   % 

 %)

     "9      " , )   %  6  $  7         %    

  < 9 A B%   7 :         7   B"# 4 . . ,

  &    *

$

 )

 5!3- 7 6 %"

C    7  6    $   8%7   )

 77          / " 6 6  

%   :   /01 6   7  

  7 "    9 %

    A B%  7:  8  

19. We thus sum-up and hold that as opposed to Section 320 Cr.P.C. where the Court is squarely guided by the compromise between the parties in respect of offences 'compoundable' within the statutory framework, the extra-ordinary power enjoined upon a High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, can be invoked beyond the metes and bounds of Section 320 Cr.P.C. Nonetheless, we reiterate that such powers of wide amplitude ought to be exercised carefully in the context of quashing criminal proceedings, bearing in mind: (i) Nature and effect of

+ the offence on the conscious of the society; (ii) Seriousness of the injury, if any; (iii) Voluntary nature of compromise between the accused and the victim; & (iv) Conduct of the accused persons, prior to and after the occurrence of the purported offence and/or other relevant considerations. (- 9

6 "   7 " 7    6

%/  7  7  " 

  6   *+ &! -. i)  9

"  77   "%6    7  

) %  01 ii)  !      6  77            "

  $ )6 %) )   4  9        %    

)    

          , )                "       % " 6

6 ,  iv)  9     /  

 %    %         6   %  , "         )  %   " 1       %  7   , "    :  D v)  :

       "   "       "  "    7    "   , )   % 

 ) "%  D

<

4  !  "  %     6   % 

 %)       "D vii)       ) 7       "    )   7    "   )     "   01 viii)  9  7     , )            :

       "  , )  %  6 $ 79 %$  66



6    

             

)  8    ) 11.

6       =  "   (9 :

       6 %)8:   +



,'

       $

$

 !!

6

"# 4 .

. ,

  &   

$

 )

 5!3    %)0

&  :   



    ,'

 

    *

!

""

 #

$%

   

69 01! (-+(.-2-*  .(+324 .2(34 &! -.  

5 !"       

/     "   "  7 - 5-67 895 /     6   7 7  (-+-* 3

8 4A 6

76  %%$ )7    

 !+!!!:0 % %) 6 $%:      0      ! --(<.2--(---*+<   $%  :   & ,

(- 10:9:-----(<+6 6 7  7     )     

6  ,( '  )/   +"!"#  

  E , ";

 

F;!  E  %  F;!