Sunil Kumar Legha v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd And ANR

107(3rd case)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH (Through Video Conferencing) CM-8308-CWP-2020 in/and CWP-33264-2019 Date of Decision:September 02, 2020 Sunil Kumar Legha .....Petitioner

Versus

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE NIRMALJIT KAUR

Present:

Mr.Sandeep Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Amrita Nagpal, Advocate for Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the applicant-respondents.

........

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL) CM-8308-CWP-2020 For the reasons mentioned in the application for dismissing the writ petition as having become infructuous, the same is allowed. CWP-33264-2019 Learned counsel for the parties agree that the relief has since been granted and accordingly, the matter is rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, accordingly.

Disposed of, as having rendered infructuous.

However, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh in case the need so arises.

September 02, 2020 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2020.09.02 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh