Parveen Kumari & ORS. v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

RA-CW No.9 of 2017 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CW No.9 of 2017 (O&M) in CWP No.3 of 2011 Date of Decision.06.02.2017 Parveen Kumari and others .......Petitioners Vs State of Haryana and others ........Respondents

Present:

Mr. Shranav Katyal, Advocate for applicants.

Mr. D.K. Mittal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL -.- AMIT RAWAL J. (ORAL) C.M. No.334 of 2017 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 527 days in filing the review application is condoned.

Application is allowed.

C.M. No.335 of 2017 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks liberty of this Court for withdrawal of the application.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

C.M. No.1455 of 2017 The application for impleading the applicants as respondent Nos.211 to 218 in CWP No.3 of 2011 is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the applicants are ordered to be impleaded as respondent Nos.211 to 218.

Amended memo of parties is taken on record and the registry is PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.16 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

RA-CW No.9 of 2017 (O&M) -2directed to put at the appropriate place.

RA-CW No.9 of 2017 The counsel for the review applicants submits that identical application bearing RA No.456 of 2015 has already been decided by this Court in the very same writ petition i.e. CWP No.3 of 2011 and therefore, the present review application may kindly be disposed of in view of the same terms.

In view of the aforementioned fact, the present review application is disposed of in view of the order passed by this Court in RA No.456 of 2015 on 23.08.2016.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 06, 2017 Pankaj* Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No PANKAJ KUMAR 2017.02.16 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document