Ravi @ Vicky @ Ravi Nayak Taparvashi v. State Of Haryana

 

  
      
  

 !

!"#$# %& & 
 
           
 
 '

( )& )
 )  ) 

  ! "#"  

$ %&"%#'"  )  ) * & +,-.

(

  )*+,-! ! *&&*)* ./

((,012+020,"&,3,",33#",43"123/! +!* 5*6#"02(0" *"%7 0 8earned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2023. )   )**  *    ) &) * * (4,!!)  

 

! and therefore the petitioner may be considered for the grant of regular bail.

3.

On the other hand,     $   %&" *  %#'"  ") " 9/
 "* (: ;"((;* )5  )  *;"  * )5 *) 5&5) *  *  !    022(020+      5        &

  ; 8    *    *  5    

 *)*"  )  <   ) ; &  )  " *&*)* 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5.

As per learned counsel for the State, *(:

;"((;"*&  " * )5 . "

5 ) * * *)*"  )  <   ")& herefore, this Court does not deem it fit and proper to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, at this stage. Consequently, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is hereby dismissed. 3 ;" &))**) 5  ! *  

  

     4 #** &

*=>" "*=>  +)  ).

  %/,0 *      ?  & @A  ? )* @A